Sunday, March 06, 2005

“complicated situation”

Wow, it is not just in this country the media and the libs think things are too complicated. Let's see now "jihad" a holy war waged on behalf of Islam as a religious duty against the no-believers. “So you do not believe in Islam, sorry but I will now have to kill you.” That does not sound too complicated for this simple southern raised boy.

The Muslims want to kill you (non believer) and proven they will when given a chance. Yes, I hear the cry of the ACLU; but let’s look at the facts; nearly every major terrorist act in the last 40 years has been committed by Muslims. And they (the believers) will tell you that Satan "America and England" must be destroyed. This still does not appear to be too complicated.

Those who are willing to sound the alarm about terrorist are called racist, I say call them self preservationist. You can call them what you like………………………


Former Metropolitan Police chief Sir John Stevens is trying to wake up Britain: Al-Qaeda ‘on streets of Britain.’

Former Metropolitan Police chief Sir John Stevens says up to 200 Al-Qaeda “terrorists” are operating in Britain and the threat of attacks is real. He urged the government to press ahead with its controversial anti-terror legislation as quickly as possible.

Sir John, writing in the News of the World, said militants trained by Osama bin Laden “fester” across the country.

But the Liberal Democrats accused him of sending “mixed messages” adding to an already “complicated situation”. Civil rights groups have also criticised the government’s plans, calling for an end to detention without trial. They say the principles of justice and human rights are fundamental to British law and should not be lost.

But Sir John said any delay in enacting the legislation would bring “comfort” to al-Qaeda. He said there were small networks of militants who had been trained by Osama bin Laden and had “spawned and continue to fester” in British towns and cities.

The Prevention of Terrorism Bill would allow authorities to impose curfews or tag suspects, as well as banning them from using telephones or the internet.

“The main opposition to the Bill, it seems to me, is from people who simply haven’t understood the brutal reality of the world we live in and the true horror of the terrorism we face,” Sir John wrote.

Sir John’s comments, which are critical of politicians opposing the proposals, may be seem [sic] by some as highly political.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home